Gold of Rome

6.5
19611h 32m

Rome 1943. The German Commandant of the city causes a turmoil in the Jewish community by offering them what seems to be an expensive way out of imprisonment and death.

Cast

Photo of Jean Sorel

Jean Sorel

Massimo

Photo of Andrea Checchi

Andrea Checchi

Ortona - father of Giulia

Photo of Umberto Raho

Umberto Raho

Rabbi Beniamino

Photo of Miranda Campa

Miranda Campa

Signora De Santis

Photo of Ignazio Leone

Ignazio Leone

Partisan from Sicily

Photo of Nando Tamberlani

Nando Tamberlani

Signor De Santis

Photo of Luigi Casellato

Luigi Casellato

Segretario-consigliere della comunità

Photo of Tino Bianchi

Tino Bianchi

Sua Eccellenza

Photo of Ugo D'Alessio

Ugo D'Alessio

Piperno, l'orefice

More Like This

Reviews

G

CinemaSerf

6/10

With the Nazis now firmly in control of the City of Rome, they have come up with a plan to extort 100 lbs of gold from it’s Jewish community else they must deliver two hundred of their most distinguished citizens up as hostage - and they know that will only be a prelude to more wholesale attacks on their faith and their assets. They have barely forty-eight hours to deliver the goods, and so many of them gather together everything of value that they possess to raise this ransom. “Davide” (Gérard Blain) wants none of this appeasement, though. He argues with his leaders that this is but the start of their persecution and that they must leave the city and join the partisans awaiting the arrival of the allies. He also has an eye for “Giulia” (Anna Maria Ferrero) but she is taken by local Catholic lad “Massimo” and a marriage to him might well see her safe from their occupiers - for now, at any rate. What now ensues sees the population divide along the lines of what to do next, but sadly that presentation is a little too superficial. Though Blain does well here as the charismatic lead and Filippo Scelzo also delivers quite poignantly as their conflicted leader determined to do what can to keep some semblance of peace until relief arrives, the other characterisations really only serve to thinly sketch out a scenario but not to really immerse us in it. It’s history, so perhaps Carlo Lizzani was assuming that we all already knew this so felt it unnecessary to fill out the detail, but with so much going on in the city, he determines to focus more on the slightly soapier elements of the storyline rather than the more menacing and intimidatory ones. The photography showcases the city and all that, but aside from one or two more robust scenes towards the end, the substance of this is lacking and I as a bit disappointed.

You've reached the end.